Difference between revisions of "Rji-pivot-resources"

From IVP Wiki
(FOLLOWUP REPORTS)
 
(19 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|}
 
|}
 
=RJI Pivot Point-Chicago / June 26-27, 2012 / OVERVIEW & RESOURCE LINKS=
 
=RJI Pivot Point-Chicago / June 26-27, 2012 / OVERVIEW & RESOURCE LINKS=
[[Category:Rji-pivot]]
+
<small>
Links, background, outcomes and next steps for a project-based gathering of the [http://www.rjionline.org Reynolds Journalism Institute]<br>
+
[http://newshare.com/wiki/index.php/Rji-pivot-resources PIVOT POINT HOME] /
 +
[http://newshare.com/wiki/index.php/Rji-pivot-projects PROJECT SUMMARIES] /
 +
[http://groups.google.com/group/rji-pivot-point GROUP BLOG] /
 +
[http://newshare.com/wiki/index.php/Rji-pivot-principles PRINCIPLES] /
 +
[http://newshare.com/pivot/participants.pdf PARTICIPANTS] /
 +
[http://newshare.com/wiki/index.php/Rji-pivot-highlights KEY READINGS] /
 +
[http://newshare.com/wiki/index.php/Rji-pivot-comments COMMENTS] /
 +
[http://newshare.com/wiki/index.php/Rji-pivot-interviews INTERVIEWS]<br>
 +
<hr>
 +
</small>[[Category:Rji-pivot]]
 +
Links, background, outcomes and next steps for a project-based gathering of the [http://www.rjionline.org Reynolds Journalism Institute]<br><br>
 +
Follow our [http://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!forum/rji-pivot-point BLOG.]<br>
 
<h4>
 
<h4>
KEY TERMS: Communties, engagement, authorship vs. co-creation, journalism, relevance, trust, curation, narrative/story-telling vs. data/information, data ownership, aggregation, disaggregation, "the industry", partner or partnerhsips, institutional authority vs. collective intelligence, bias, disintermediation, competition, hyper-local, actionable information, content.<br>
+
KEY TERMS: Communties, engagement, revenue, sharing, identity, trust, privacy, authorship vs. co-creation, journalism, relevance, trust, curation, narrative/story-telling vs. data/information, data ownership, aggregation, disaggregation, "the industry", partner or partnerships, institutional authority vs. collective intelligence, bias, disintermediation, competition, hyper-local, actionable information, content.<br>
 
==EIGHT PROJECTS==
 
==EIGHT PROJECTS==
 +
[[Image:Rji-pivot-wordle1.jpg|300px|thumb|right|Day-two reports tag cloud]]
 +
[[Image:Journalism-tag-cloud.jpg|300px|thumb|right|First-day tag cloud]]
 
*GO TO [http://newshare.com/wiki/index.php/Rji-pivot-projects WORKING PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS]</h4>
 
*GO TO [http://newshare.com/wiki/index.php/Rji-pivot-projects WORKING PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS]</h4>
 
==FOLLOWUP REPORTS==
 
==FOLLOWUP REPORTS==
*[http://streetfightmag.com/2012/07/05/for-troubled-news-industry-is-it-enough-to-pivot/ Participant Tom Grubisich's "Street Fight" column]
+
*Tom Grubisich: [http://streetfightmag.com/2012/07/05/for-troubled-news-industry-is-it-enough-to-pivot/ "Street Fight" column: Is "pivot" enough?]
 +
*Randy Picht: [http://rjionline.org/blog/pivot-point-chicago Goal is "actionable projects"]
 +
*Bill Densmore: [https://www.rjionline.org/stories/pivot-point-next-steps An appeal for suggestions] / Industry needs to:<ul><ul>
 +
*Work better together
 +
*Develop revenue beyond advertising
 +
*Forge deeper relationships with users</ul></ul>
 +
 
 +
==NEWS ABOUT OUR PARTICIPANTS==
 +
*[http://gigaom.com/2012/10/15/circa-wants-to-rethink-the-news-at-a-sub-atomic-level/ Matt Galligan / Ben Huh's Circa starts beta trials] (GigaOm, Oct. 13, 2012) ALSO: [http://www.geekwire.com/2012/journalism-startup-circa-launches-hopes-redefine-news-presentation/ GeekWire version]
  
 
==WHO PARTICIPATED==
 
==WHO PARTICIPATED==
[[Image:Rji-pivot-wordle1.jpg|300px|thumb|right|Day-two reports tag cloud]]
 
[[Image:Journalism-tag-cloud.jpg|300px|thumb|right|First-day tag cloud]]
 
 
*READ/PRINT [http://newshare.com/pivot/participants.pdf Our participant list] / (Don Heider couldn't come)
 
*READ/PRINT [http://newshare.com/pivot/participants.pdf Our participant list] / (Don Heider couldn't come)
 
*VIEW [http://www.flickr.com/photos/infovalet/sets/72157630144267624/ Photos of participants] (click on image to view mini-bio) / ALSO: [http://www.flickr.com/photos/infovalet/sets/72157630463389978/ CANDIDS]
 
*VIEW [http://www.flickr.com/photos/infovalet/sets/72157630144267624/ Photos of participants] (click on image to view mini-bio) / ALSO: [http://www.flickr.com/photos/infovalet/sets/72157630463389978/ CANDIDS]
Line 42: Line 61:
 
*We would like to focus on the question -- what can we do better together?
 
*We would like to focus on the question -- what can we do better together?
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
[[Image:Rji-pivot-working-groups-tuesday.jpg|450px|thumb|right|]]
 
  
 
==UPDATING HIGHLIGHTS==
 
==UPDATING HIGHLIGHTS==
Line 55: Line 73:
  
 
==PRE-CONVENING INTERVIEWS==
 
==PRE-CONVENING INTERVIEWS==
 +
[[Image:Rji-pivot-working-groups-tuesday.jpg|450px|thumb|right|]]
  
 
*START [http://newshare.com/wiki/index.php/Rji-pivot-interviews The pre-convening INTERVIEW process]
 
*START [http://newshare.com/wiki/index.php/Rji-pivot-interviews The pre-convening INTERVIEW process]
Line 64: Line 83:
 
*In a 27-page report based on an in-depth study of proprietary sales and readership data from 37 U.S. daily newspapers, authors Tom Rosenstiel and Mark Jurkowitz conclude that "digital gains can't make up print loses and papers "are not well positioned to take advantage of ... growth in targeted advertising." The report [http://www.journalism.org/sites/journalism.org/files/SEARCHFORNEWREVENUEMODEL.pdf (download PDF)] quotes one executive:<br><br>
 
*In a 27-page report based on an in-depth study of proprietary sales and readership data from 37 U.S. daily newspapers, authors Tom Rosenstiel and Mark Jurkowitz conclude that "digital gains can't make up print loses and papers "are not well positioned to take advantage of ... growth in targeted advertising." The report [http://www.journalism.org/sites/journalism.org/files/SEARCHFORNEWREVENUEMODEL.pdf (download PDF)] quotes one executive:<br><br>
 
<ul><ul>
 
<ul><ul>
<hr><h4>"The big issue . . . is who gets the right to deliver the time and location sensitive message. it won't be everybody that gets the right to come into my pocket and beep me because I just walked into the mall . . . So how do we, as the newspaper in town, do what we need to do now to make sure a year or two years down the road, we are the ones with permission and a trusted relationship with the consumer."</h4>
+
<hr>
 +
<big>"The big issue . . . is who gets the right to deliver the time and location sensitive message. it won't be everybody that gets the right to come into my pocket and beep me because I just walked into the mall . . . So how do we, as the newspaper in town, do what we need to do now to make sure a year or two years down the road, we are the ones with permission and a trusted relationship with the consumer."</big>
 
<hr><br>
 
<hr><br>
 
[[Image:Pej-chart.png|230px|thumb|left|Source: Pew Research Center]]
 
[[Image:Pej-chart.png|230px|thumb|left|Source: Pew Research Center]]

Latest revision as of 21:12, 1 November 2016

Contents

RJI Pivot Point-Chicago / June 26-27, 2012 / OVERVIEW & RESOURCE LINKS

PIVOT POINT HOME / PROJECT SUMMARIES / GROUP BLOG / PRINCIPLES / PARTICIPANTS / KEY READINGS / COMMENTS / INTERVIEWS


Links, background, outcomes and next steps for a project-based gathering of the Reynolds Journalism Institute

Follow our BLOG.

KEY TERMS: Communties, engagement, revenue, sharing, identity, trust, privacy, authorship vs. co-creation, journalism, relevance, trust, curation, narrative/story-telling vs. data/information, data ownership, aggregation, disaggregation, "the industry", partner or partnerships, institutional authority vs. collective intelligence, bias, disintermediation, competition, hyper-local, actionable information, content.

EIGHT PROJECTS

Day-two reports tag cloud
First-day tag cloud

FOLLOWUP REPORTS

NEWS ABOUT OUR PARTICIPANTS

WHO PARTICIPATED

WORKING GROUP BULLET-POINT REPORTS: DAY ONE

FLIP PAD VISUALS: TRENDS, INDUSTRY FORCES AND MARKET FORCES


GETTING STARTED: PRECONVENING