Difference between revisions of "Rji-pivot-comments"
From IVP Wiki
(New page: =RJI Pivot Point Participant Comments= ====Discussions suggestions from Chris Peck, editor, The [Memphis] Commercial Appeal and board member, ASNE: <br><br> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:51:...) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
paid digital model. | paid digital model. | ||
| − | + | #Paid digital subscriptions. The revenue issues continue to eat away at the heart of journalism for legacy companies. The focus | |
simply must on holding circulation revenues in a digital formats. | simply must on holding circulation revenues in a digital formats. | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
ripe. | ripe. | ||
| − | + | #Privacy issues. Not central to discussion of future of journal per se, but an issue that likely will cut both ways for journalists | |
in the years ahead. Less privacy could mean more access to information for journalists and the public. But less privacy will also stir | in the years ahead. Less privacy could mean more access to information for journalists and the public. But less privacy will also stir | ||
up concerns about open government and public records. Journalism needs to be on side of openness, but also respect personal privacy | up concerns about open government and public records. Journalism needs to be on side of openness, but also respect personal privacy | ||
Revision as of 18:07, 12 June 2012
RJI Pivot Point Participant Comments
====Discussions suggestions from Chris Peck, editor, The [Memphis] Commercial Appeal and board member, ASNE:
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:51:31 -0700
From: "Peck, Chris" <peck@commercialappeal.com>
- Focus on tablets. For legacy newspapers, I firmly believe the tablet offers the best hope for moving current print subscribers to a
paid digital model.
- Paid digital subscriptions. The revenue issues continue to eat away at the heart of journalism for legacy companies. The focus
simply must on holding circulation revenues in a digital formats.
- Partnerships. The ideas we discussed at Rutgers about building partnerships now between legacy media and emerging media would see
ripe.
- Privacy issues. Not central to discussion of future of journal per se, but an issue that likely will cut both ways for journalists
in the years ahead. Less privacy could mean more access to information for journalists and the public. But less privacy will also stir up concerns about open government and public records. Journalism needs to be on side of openness, but also respect personal privacy concerns.
- Finally, I've attached the most recent research on the usage of digital devices done by Roger Fidler. Some good stuff here for your
use ....
