Difference between revisions of "Newsecosystem"
From IVP Wiki
(→Idea catalysts) |
(→Other useful links) |
||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
==Other useful links== | ==Other useful links== | ||
| − | *[http://www.newshare.com/wiki/index.php/Blueprint-form A "stalking horse" for ITE governance] | + | *PRIVACY/IDENTITY: Drummond Reed and Ann Cavoukian -- [https://www.privacybydesign.ca/content/uploads/2013/12/pbd-big_privacy.pdf A primer on personal clouds, XDI, link contracts, accountable pseudonyms, and contractual anonymity] |
| + | [http://www.newshare.com/wiki/index.php/Blueprint-form A "stalking horse" for ITE governance] | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Revision as of 14:07, 29 April 2015
Contents
PRIVACY . . . IDENTITY . . . ADVERTISING . . . COMMERCE
INFOVALET AT REYNOLDS JOURNALISM INSTITUTE . . . ABOUT THE NEW(S)SOCIAL NETWORK . . . OTHER LINKS/COMMENT . . .VIDEO RESOURCES
Event Page: "From Paper to Persona to Payment:
Considering a New(s) Ecosystem for News, Information and Privacy."
This is the temporary landing page for a May 7, 2015 gathering organized by the Donald W. Reynolds Journalism Institute. If you are interested in participating, please email Bill Densmore, or call Bill at 617-448-6600. The standing URL: http://www.newsecosystem.org will reach current updates.
THE DRAFT REPORT:
- PDF DOWNLOAD: Draft report "From Persona to Payment."
- Bill Densmore's Nov. 2014 slide deck for the Vermont Journalism Trust
- RJI blog posts about the report substance.
- Editor & Publisher: "Imagining the 21st Century Personal News Experience." (PDF version)
Idea catalysts
- Jeff Jarvis on the need for open standards for identity-data transfer: "It's the relationship, stupid!"
- What is advisortising?
- Buzz Wurzer and Bill Densmore on "the four-party model."
- Robert Picard explains how a wholesale-retail market could function with digital information
- What can the ITE do to give news organizations a "persona" competitor to Google and Facebook (see ADWEEK on Google effort)
- NYU Prof. Clay Shirky, summarized by the NYT Public Editor and commenting on our O'Hare gathering: "This looks amazing . . . we're in Shanghai this year, so I won't be able to join you, but I'm so glad you all are doing this." READ ALSO: Shirky's 2009 post: "Newspapers and Thinking the Unthinkable" and Mathew Ingram's comments on same, with chart.
- Washington Post Executive Editor Marty Baron on journalism's transition from print to digital.
- THE NEW NEWS SERVICE? "The Eternal Return of BuzzFeed"
What more experts say
- Tom Grubisich writing at SreetFightMag: Can an exchange help solve the problem of monetizing digital content?
- Paul Gillin: "Can Densmore's vision work? It has to."
- Andy Oram: "Why a new proposal for making the news business sustainable deserves attention."
- BACKGROUND: The Information Valet project
Links to new FTC initiative
- http://www.engadget.com/2015/03/23/ftc-office-of-technology-research/
- http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2015/03/23/the-ftc-beefs-up-technology-investigations-with-new-office/
- https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/blogs/techftc/2015/03/booting-new-research-office-ftc
Other useful links
- PRIVACY/IDENTITY: Drummond Reed and Ann Cavoukian -- A primer on personal clouds, XDI, link contracts, accountable pseudonyms, and contractual anonymity
A "stalking horse" for ITE governance
Extended thoughts
- These comments were appended to a New York Times Public Editor blog post of April 10, 2015: "A Darker Narrative of Print's Future from Clay Shirky"
-
Marc Edge -- journalism educator, media critic, and blogger from Vancouver/Richmond, BC -- wrote: "Shirky’s hypothesis is indeed speculative. This discussion reminds me of most of the uninformed speculation regarding the future of newspapers that has been going on for the past seven years, since the Rocky Mountain News folded and the Seattle P-I went online-only. I have done quite a bit of research into the business model of newspapers and I have concluded in my recent book, Greatly Exaggerated: The Myth of the Death of Newspapers, that it actually quite robust and should allow the venerable newspaper to survive in print form for the foreseeable future. There’s one very good reason -- they are all still profitable. Here’s a review of my research: "Why are American Newspapers Still Profitable." ... Here’s a review of my book ... Here’s an excerpt: http://www.marcedge.com/GEintro.pdf "
Les Gapay -- Palm Desert, CA -- wrote: "I'm a retired newspaper reporter who worked at both the national and local levels. I don't subscribe to a paper anymore. They're not worth the money and I can read all the news I want for free online at Google or Yahoo from publications all around the U.S. and the world. Less than once a month I pick up a hard copy of a paper if I want to just sit down and relax with a newspaper for a while. I spend a lot of time during each day reading news online and get my fill, so why bother with a print edition. The hey-day of print journalism is over. We're in the middle of the move to digital. How quickly print papers disappear is irrelevant to me and is mostly relevant to executives of newspapers. Their digital form will survive and maybe a weekly paper edition full of features and analyses for reading on the weekend. Reporting is done mainly by newspapers and that will continue. Readers want journalism. News has to be covered. When there are breaking stories I watch them live on TV or read about them on my cell phone. Print editions have one foot in the grave, but are resurrecting online. Focus on making the transition. As for subscribing to news web sites, I don't have to right now; can read most of what I want for free paid for by advertising. But I wouldn't mind paying if I had to or if the content was especially good. Times web site too cluttered and stories too long and too wordy. If I had to, I would prefer to pay for a site that gives me stories from many news providers.
